Page 48 - GUIAS ESC ESH 2018
P. 48

48                                                                                     ESC/ESH Guidelines


                                                            .
          renal denervation originally reported in the Symplicity HTN-1 and  . . .  7.6.4 Other devices
          HTN-2 trials. 365  A reduction in sympathetic activity following renal  . . .  The carotid body is located at the bifurcation of the common carotid.
          denervation has also been observed. 366  However, two RCTs with a  . . .  It is innervated by nerve fibres from the vagus nerve through the cer-
          sham procedure control 367,368  failed to document the superiority of  . . .  vical ganglion and the carotid sinus nerve. 379  Stimulation of the caro-
          renal denervation compared with the sham procedure in reducing  . . .  tid body drives sympathetic tone, resulting in an increase in BP and
          BP, but did confirm the safety of the procedure. Another RCT, the  . . .  minute ventilation. Surgical resection of the carotid body is associated
          Renal Denervation for Hypertension (DENERHTN) trial, 369  showed  . . .  with reductions in BP 380  and sympathetic overactivity in patients with
          the superiority of renal denervation in combination with optimized  . . .  heart failure. 381  Devices for endovascular carotid body modification
          pharmacotherapy compared with pharmacotherapy alone. The  . . .  by ultrasound-guided ablation have been developed and are currently
          PRAGUE-15 study 370  documented similar effects between renal  . . .  under investigation.
          denervation and optimized pharmacotherapy (mainly by adding spi-  . . .  In summary, device-based therapy for hypertension is a fast-
          ronolactone) with respect to BP-lowering efficacy; however, the lat-  . . .  moving field. Further sham-controlled studies are needed before
          ter was associated with more side effects and high discontinuation  . . .  device-based therapies can be recommended for the routine treat-
          rates. Beyond resistant hypertension, interim data in the first 80  . . .  ment of hypertension outside of the framework of clinical trials.
          patients treated with renal denervation but with no background anti-  . . .
          hypertensive therapy showed a modest effect of renal denervation  . . .
          vs. sham control on 24 h ambulatory BP after 3 months. 366  This study  .
          is ongoing.                                           Device-based therapies for hypertension
           Evaluating the efficacy of renal denervation has been challenging
          because the procedure needs to be applied to a population with a  Recommendation       Class a  Level b
          high probability of BP response. This is complicated by (i) the com-
                                                                  Use of device-based therapies is not recom-
          plex pathophysiology of hypertension, (ii) the lack of clinically applica-
                                                                  mended for the routine treatment of hyperten-
          ble measures of sympathetic activity, (iii) the absence of predictors of
                                                                  sion, unless in the context of clinical studies  III  B
          the long-term BP response following renal denervation, and (iv) the
                                                                  and RCTs, until further evidence regarding their
          absence of reliable markers of procedural success to immediately               367,368
          establish whether denervation has been achieved. 371  There is evi-  safety and efficacy becomes available.
          dence indicating that isolated systolic hypertension, characterized by
          increased aortic stiffness, is associated with a limited response to  RCT = randomized controlled trial.
                                                                a Class of recommendation.
          renal denervation 372,373  and baroreceptor stimulation (see above).  b Level of evidence.
          Except for rare problems related to the catheterization procedure
          (access site complications, vessel dissection, etc.), no major complica-
          tions or deterioration of renal function have been reported.
           Major uncertainties remain as to the clinical role of renal denerva-  8 Hypertension in specific
          tion outside of clinical studies, which should be performed in carefully
          selected patients at specialist hypertension centres and by experi-  circumstances
          enced operators.
                                                               8.1 Resistant hypertension
          7.6.3 Creation of an arteriovenous fistula           8.1.1 Definition of resistant hypertension
          The central iliac arteriovenous anastomosis creates a fixed-calibre (4  Hypertension is defined as resistant to treatment when the recom-
          mm) conduit between the external iliac artery and vein using a stent-  mended treatment strategy fails to lower office SBP and DBP values
          like nitinol device (ROX arteriovenous coupler). 374,375  Device  to <140 mmHg and/or <90 mmHg, respectively, and the inadequate
          deployment can be verified and is reversible, resulting in the diversion  control of BP is confirmed by ABPM or HBPM in patients whose
          of arterial blood (0.8–1 L/min) into the venous circuit with immedi-  adherence to therapy has been confirmed. The recommended treat-
          ate, verifiable reductions in BP. 374,375  The BP-lowering effect of arte-  ment strategy should include appropriate lifestyle measures and
          riovenous anastomosis was first observed in a study of patients with  treatment with optimal or best-tolerated doses of three or more
          chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), in whom a moder-  drugs, which should include a diuretic, typically an ACE inhibitor or
          ate improvement in the 6 min walking test was shown. 376  In the ROX  an ARB, and a CCB. Pseudo-resistant hypertension (see below) and
          CONTROL HTN trial, patients with resistant hypertension were  secondary causes of hypertension should also have been excluded
          randomized to receive either standard care or insertion of an arterio-  (see section 8.2).
          venous coupler in combination with standard care. 377  At 6 months,  Prevalence studies of resistant hypertension have been limited by
          office and ambulatory BP were significantly reduced in the coupler  variation in the definition used, and reported prevalence rates range
          group compared with the control group. Some important safety  from 5–30% in patients with treated hypertension. After applying a
          aspects need to be considered. Ipsilateral venous stenosis, which  strict definition (see above) and having excluded causes of pseudo-
          needed venoplasty and/or stenting, occurred in 29% of patients.  resistant hypertension (see section 8.1.2), the true prevalence of
          There were no reports of right heart failure or high-output cardiac  resistant hypertension is likely to be <10% of treated patients.
          failure after device implantation over the short-term, but longer  Patients with resistant hypertension are at higher risk of HMOD,
          follow-up is clearly needed. 377,378                 CKD, and premature CV events. 382


  Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339/5079119
  by guest
  on 27 August 2018
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53